Rochkind, “FRBRization is not FRBRization”
Jonathan Rochkind makes a good point in “FRBRization” Is Not FRBRization:
It continues to frustrate me that the term “FRBRization” and “FRBR” is used to mean “grouping records into work sets”, “collocating records for the work”…. Can we somehow please stop calling work set clustering “FRBRization”? You know what a good term for it is? How about “work set clustering”.
I agree entirely. This is a large misrepresentation of FRBR. Work set clustering is relatively easy, but what we really want is to get medieval on complicated relationships.