A weblog following developments around the world in FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records.

Maintained by William Denton, Web Librarian at York University. Suggestions and comments welcome at wtd@pobox.com.


Confused? Try What Is FRBR? (2.8 MB PDF) by Barbara Tillett, or Jenn Riley's introduction. For more, see the basic reading list.

Books: FRBR: A Guide for the Perplexed by Robert Maxwell (ISBN 9780838909508) and Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools edited by Arlene Taylor (ISBN 9781591585091) (read my chapter FRBR and the History of Cataloging).

Calendar

September 2007
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

10 September 2007

Allen, Faceted Classification and FRBR

Filed under: Blog Mentions — William Denton @ 7:40 am

Last month I saw a demonstration of Siderean’s Seamark Navigator, which they call a “relational navigation server” but which you can think of as a sort of RDF search engine. It looked pretty impressive, believe me.

Bradley Allen is the Chief Technology Officer at Siderean, and he was doing some of the demo. There were a couple of questions about FRBR and he gave informed answers. One thing he said really caught my attention and set me to tugging thoughtfully on my beard. He said:

work + facets = expressions = manifestations + tags

By facets he means not the facets that come from a faceted classification system, but the kinds easily divined from MARC records: year of publication, call number range, format (book, music, video, map), language, subject headings, etc.

Last Wednesday in a blog post titled Faceted Classification and FRBR he talks about this after redefining the Group 1 entities!

  • An item is a unique physical embodiment of a work (i.e., a singleton set).
  • A work is a set of items with the same intellectual content.
  • An expression is a set of items with the same realization of intellectual content.
  • A manifestation is a set of items with the same production history.

This set of definitions allows us to shift the burden of effort in creating a FRBRized catalog from defining specific entities of the four classes with explicit relationships from one level to the other (which, I believe is the assumed work process) to simple entry of values for facets associated with production, realization and intellectual property metadata on a per-item basis.